I ve started the github project now i just need to learn rust... https://github.com/Stibbons/rust-for-pythonists Le 18 nov. 2013 21:10, "Brian Anderson" <[email protected]> a écrit :
> On 11/15/2013 06:24 AM, Gaetan wrote: > > I would love a documentation "Rust for Pythonist" or "Rust for C++'iste". > > I don't like the Wiki page. I think the official documentation homepage > should be a nice, beautiful > http://doc.rust-lang.org/<http://static.rust-lang.org/>. > Period. > It should link all "official" documentation in a logical way. > Maybe it should provide a link to the wiki page with only "incubating" > documentation. > > I think it should be derived from rst/markdown files in conf, closely > linked to the current version of rust lang. Maybe divided in several > modules (the summary for rust 0.8 derives from files in the rust 0.8 > branch, for master files are on master, branch...). > > > I would take a patch that does this. > > > ----- > Gaetan > > > > 2013/11/15 Daniel Micay <[email protected]> > >> On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 7:46 AM, spir <[email protected]> wrote: >> > I'm exploring the tutorial "Rust for Rubyists" at >> > [http://www.rustforrubyists.com/book/book.html], which in fact is not >> (only) >> > for rubyists, as stated in the introduction. Looks pretty good to me >> (just >> > my opinion), should definitely be pointed to from the Rust Docs page at >> > [https://github.com/mozilla/rust/wiki/Docs], and in good place. As a >> > tutorial, it is in my view far better than the "official" one, and is >> > up-to-date (Rust 0.8), so maybe even just replace it; with a warning >> note. >> > >> > The "official" tutorial is not a bad doc in itself (I guess) but is >> > definitely not a _tutorial_: in fact, it requires quite a knowledge of >> Rust, >> > its fundamental concepts and jargon. "Rust for Rubyists" certainly has >> room >> > for improvement, but it _is_ for sure a tutorial. I would definitely >> suggest >> > to start writing a new official tutorial by using "Rust for Rubyists" >> as raw >> > material. A first pass may be to make it slightly more general, just >> > requiring prior programming experience; Rust definitely is not a >> language >> > for programming novices, anyway. >> > >> > Denis >> >> The tutorial is currently quite flawed and has ended up being a list >> of language features with overviews and low quality examples. Parts of >> it are approaching the right level of information, but it's not >> written in the style expected of a tutorial. >> >> I think it's very important to cover the core language features like >> boxes and references at a high level. The unique and least >> approachable features need great introductory coverage. I recently >> replaced the old sections on owned boxes, vectors and strings, so any >> concrete feedback on those would be helpful. >> _______________________________________________ >> Rust-dev mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/rust-dev >> > > > > _______________________________________________ > Rust-dev mailing > [email protected]https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/rust-dev > > > > _______________________________________________ > Rust-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/rust-dev > >
_______________________________________________ Rust-dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/rust-dev
