I was just thinking that some random post on a mailing list could easily get lost in time like tears in rain, but a github enhancement request is bound to get noticed at some point. Thus if the suggestion is not total nonsense, it warrants an enhancement request. I just don't want to be spamming the github issue list.
On 2013-11-16, at 8:18, Oren Ben-Kiki <[email protected]> wrote: > I'm not certain whether it is better than anonymous members; one has to list > all the data members one by one, and there's "more" magic syntax. But it is > up to the "powers-that-be". > > > On Sat, Nov 16, 2013 at 5:48 AM, Tommi <[email protected]> wrote: > So... did anyone think that my idea (of doing multiple-inheritance by > separating the responsibilities of providing functionality and providing data > between the trait and the type which implements the trait) would warrant an > enhancement request at github? Or how do these things tend to work around > here? (I've done plenty of bug/enhancement reporting for D, but I know that > language fairly well whereas I've just barely read the Rust tutorial/manual).
_______________________________________________ Rust-dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/rust-dev
