On 12/03/2013 06:02 AM, Benjamin Striegel wrote:
> The idea of an online user forum would be that people with an interest in Rust can read in the user forum which is easier to peruse than some mail list archive. Asking and getting answers seems to work more fluently.

I agree with the principle, but we have yet to identify what users would actually want to peruse in a discussion forum. For questions, we have StackOverflow. For keeping up with the cool projects that the community is working on, we have reddit. Piggybacking on established platforms will lead to easier discoverability and broader readership.

I also believe that we should lean heavily on external resources wherever possible. Maintaining our own infrastructure is very time consuming and we've already got a lot. We could put more focus on stackoverflow by linking it from the wiki and encouraging community members to curate it better (I know I haven't looked at it in a long time).

Currently, I'm more in favor of adding a rust-users mailing list than setting up a web forum, but there are pros and cons to each approach:

* creating another *type* of venue for general discussion runs the risk of dividing the user base
* mailing lists are easy to create and administer at Mozilla
* web forums can be much easier to moderate, and we've had a few incidents on the mailing list recently * mailing lists are simple to archive and maintaining a record of Rust's development is imortant to me * if we did set up a forum, it seems like we should shut down the mailing list to avoid dividing the user base, which feels kind of unfortunate simply because having a mailing list is a matter of pride


Which isn't to say that a discussion forum won't be warranted sometime in the future, but for now we're getting along quite well with the free alternatives provided by the broader web.


On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 3:43 AM, <jeti...@web.de <mailto:jeti...@web.de>> wrote:

    The idea of an online user forum would be that people with an
    interest in Rust can read in the user forum which is easier to
    peruse than some mail list archive. Asking and getting answers
    seems to work more fluently.
    There is really hell going on on the Go users forum:
    https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=de#!forum/golang-nuts
    <https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=de#%21forum/golang-nuts> An
    online forum seems to intensivy people's interest in some
    language. But it's certainly your language and your decision what
    you want to do.

    Regards, Oliver
    *Gesendet:* Dienstag, 03. Dezember 2013 um 07:35 Uhr
    *Von:* "Eric Reed" <ecr...@cs.washington.edu
    <mailto:ecr...@cs.washington.edu>>
    *An:* "David Piepgrass" <qwertie...@gmail.com
    <mailto:qwertie...@gmail.com>>
    *Cc:* "rust-dev@mozilla.org <mailto:rust-dev@mozilla.org>"
    <rust-dev@mozilla.org <mailto:rust-dev@mozilla.org>>
    *Betreff:* Re: [rust-dev] Rust forum
    Well there's always r/rust/ <http://www.reddit.com/r/rust/>. It
    usually works pretty well.
    On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 9:45 PM, David Piepgrass
    <qwertie...@gmail.com <http://qwertie...@gmail.com>> wrote:

        On 02/12/2013 16:21, David Piepgrass wrote:

            > That would be so. much. better. than a mailing list.
            Hi. Could you expand on this? I don?t necessarily
            disagree, but as the
            one proposing change it?s up to you to convince everyone
            else :)

            --
            Simon Sapin

        Okay, well, I've never liked mailing lists at all, because:
        1. In non-digest mode, My inbox gets flooded.
        2. In digest mode, it's quite inconvenient to write a reply,
        having to cut out all the messages that I don't want to reply
        to and manually edit the subject line. Also, unrelated
        messages are grouped together while threads are broken apart,
        making discussions harder to follow.
        3. In email I don't get a threaded view. If I go to mailing
        list archives to see a threaded view, I can't reply.
        4. I have to manually watch for replies to my messages or to
        threads I'm following. If someone mentions my name (not that
        they would), I won't be notified.
        In contrast, Discourse has a variety of email notification
        options. I don't know if those options are enough to please
        everybody, but you can probably configure it to notify you
        about all posts, which makes it essentially equivalent to a
        mailing list. It supports reply by email, so those that prefer
        a mailing list can still pretend it's a mailing list.
        Currently I'm getting an shrunk digest of Discourse Meta--by
        email I only get a subset of all messages, auto-selected by
        Discourse, whatever it thinks is interesting. That's good for
        me: I really don't want to see every message.
        Plus, a mailing list offers less privacy as it mandates
        publishing your email address. That's not a big deal for me
        personally, but do you really want to require that from every
        Rust user?
        (btw, if I'm wrong about any of the above points, I promise
        there are lots of other netizens out there who have the same
        misconception(s), so many of them will avoid mailing lists.
        The fact that y'all are talking to me on a mailing list
        suggests that the disadvantages of a mailing list are not a
        big deal *to you*, but as for those who aren't participating,
        you can't conclude *they* prefer mailing lists.)
        And like mailing lists, Discourse also supports private messages.
        I don't understand why Paul mentioned GPG. You want to encrypt
        messages to a public mailing list? You can sign messages, but
        surely almost no one actually checks the signature, and I'd be
        surprised if Discourse didn't offer some built-in evidence of
        identity (surely it's not like email in letting you spoof the
        sender name easily?).
        I heard discourse supports attachments, just that you may have
        to go to the forum to attach or download them (rather than by
        email).

        _______________________________________________
        Rust-dev mailing list
        Rust-dev@mozilla.org <http://Rust-dev@mozilla.org>
        https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/rust-dev


    _______________________________________________
    Rust-dev mailing list
    Rust-dev@mozilla.org <mailto:Rust-dev@mozilla.org>
    https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/rust-dev




_______________________________________________
Rust-dev mailing list
Rust-dev@mozilla.org
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/rust-dev

_______________________________________________
Rust-dev mailing list
Rust-dev@mozilla.org
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/rust-dev

Reply via email to