On Mon, Dec 30, 2013 at 2:00 PM, Armin Ronacher <[email protected]> wrote: > TL;DR: please don't rush a 1.0 release.
FWIW I'm all for waiting as well. That said maybe it would be worth it to discuss having a 1.0 soonish with a clear timeline that could maybe bring both sides together: - 1 or 2 years of planned BC/bugfixes/support depending on who can or wants to provide such reassurances. Therefore libs could stabilize on 1.x releases for now and more people could use rust for more than play-things, bringing more experience towards.. - a 2.0 planned with BC breaks planned for a year after the 1.0 release, which would allow broader changes to still happen in the master branch, and make sure we don't get stuck with rushed decisions for 10 years. Cheers _______________________________________________ Rust-dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/rust-dev
