On Tue, Dec 31, 2013 at 10:39 AM, Gábor Lehel <[email protected]> wrote: > > Speaking of which: I completely agree with Patrick that there's no point to > blocking Rust 1.0 on backwards compatible features. The reason I'm > nonetheless wary of a drive to finalize the language too soon is that there > are still some really huge things outstanding, such as DST/SST, that we > still need to figure out, let alone implement, and ideally after > implementation there should also be a cooling-off period to see if > everything's working well, and that there aren't further issues that end up > getting raised as a consequence (or if there are, how to address them), and > so forth.
Adding a backwards compatible feature can completely change the idioms of the language. Of course, if we're not worried about stabilizing the standard library then it doesn't matter. _______________________________________________ Rust-dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/rust-dev
