Bootstrapping comes to mind as a potential problem, but LLVM and Clang use it too.
_______________________________________________ Rust-dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/rust-dev
I'm all for CMake. Not so much for the technical merits, but the amount
of infrastructure already built up around it. KDE has adopted it
wholesale, meaning all the dependencies of the entire KDE project are
supported out of the box, and also IDE support in KDevelop, Qt Creator,
emacs/vi etc.
- Re: [rust-dev] RFC: Future of the Build Sys... SiegeLord
- Re: [rust-dev] RFC: Future of the Build... Gaetan
- Re: [rust-dev] RFC: Future of the ... Erick Tryzelaar
- Re: [rust-dev] RFC: Future of the Build Sys... Jan Niklas Hasse
- Re: [rust-dev] RFC: Future of the Build... Thad Guidry
- Re: [rust-dev] RFC: Future of the ... Robert Knight
- Re: [rust-dev] RFC: Future of the ... Patrick Walton
- Re: [rust-dev] RFC: Future of the Build System james
- Re: [rust-dev] RFC: Future of the Build System George Makrydakis
- Re: [rust-dev] RFC: Future of the Build System Brian Anderson
- Re: [rust-dev] RFC: Future of the Build System György Andrasek
- Re: [rust-dev] RFC: Future of the Build System Jan Niklas Hasse
