I'm seeing unnecessarily hostile and dismissive comments from several
participants here. If you can't be civil, then ignore the thread and move
on.


On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 11:40 PM, Liigo Zhuang <com.li...@gmail.com> wrote:

> If I select Rust as my main language, I don't think I have any reason to
> write new code in Go. Go away!
> 2014年3月5日 上午3:44于 "John Mija" <jon...@proinbox.com>写道:
>
> Every time there is a new language, developers have to start to developing
>> from scratch the same algorithms.
>> The alternative has been to use C libraries already built since is much
>> easier to interface with other languages and a lot of languages will let
>> you call C functions directly.
>>
>> But C language is unsafe and there is a penalty performance at binding.
>> Besides, it is harder to debug incorrect C code.
>>
>> So, why don't use a simple language but safe like Go?
>> The Go compilers create a single intermediate file representing the
>> "binary assembly" of the compiled package, ready as input for the linker:
>> http://golang.org/cmd/gc/
>>
>> I'm supposed that a linker could be built to link that intermediate file
>> together to a Rust program.
>>
>> The main advantage is that you would use a simpler language to build
>> algorithms and code of lower level (asm), wich could be linked from other
>> languages.
>> Rust is a language more complex to replace to C like "universal language".
>>
>> Note: I love both languages; Go for web apps and Rust for everything else
>> (mobile and desktop apps, and servers).
>> _______________________________________________
>> Rust-dev mailing list
>> Rust-dev@mozilla.org
>> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/rust-dev
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Rust-dev mailing list
> Rust-dev@mozilla.org
> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/rust-dev
>
>
_______________________________________________
Rust-dev mailing list
Rust-dev@mozilla.org
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/rust-dev

Reply via email to