On 24/06/14 01:34 AM, Daniel Micay wrote:
> On 24/06/14 01:22 AM, comex wrote:
>> On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 1:17 AM, Jerry Morrison <jhm...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Does `checked { }` mean all functions within that scope use checked-integer
>>> arithmetic? This sounds great to me.
>>
>> Bikeshed: If this happens there should also be a module-level
>> attribute alternative to avoid unnecessary indentation.
>
> I think it would actually work best as a lint-like attribute you could
> apply at any item level or to a block. It would flip the behaviour of
> the operators for that scope, and you could override it any number of
> times in inner scopes.By 'flip' I mean *override*, you'd have both #[checked] and #[unchecked], although preferably with clearer names.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Rust-dev mailing list Rust-dev@mozilla.org https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/rust-dev
