On Thu, Jul 03, 2008 at 04:29:44AM +0100, David Chanters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> A pity -- does this mean xterm is broken in this regard, or is the
> decision on xterm's part to ignore the ECMA thing and just blink
> regardless?
xterm is fully in line with ecma itself (at least in that respect) - ecma-48
doesn't mandate support for blinking in any way.
> Either way, if i really did want to override this "restriction" in
> rxvt-unicode, is it just a matter of providing different attributes in
> the rxvt-unicode terminfo database, or have i somehow missed the point
> entirely?
you cannot have blinking with coloured text, because blink is used for
high-intensity background colours. blinking only works with the default
text colours.
--
The choice of a Deliantra, the free code+content MORPG
-----==- _GNU_ http://www.deliantra.net
----==-- _ generation
---==---(_)__ __ ____ __ Marc Lehmann
--==---/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-=====/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\
_______________________________________________
rxvt-unicode mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.schmorp.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rxvt-unicode
