On Mon, Jul 07, 2008 at 03:00:42PM -0700, Joseph Comfort <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> very significant and unwelcome change. It will seriously mess up my
> work, and I will probably have to find some other tool.
If other tools do the job for you, you definitely should switch.
> All past history (including DEC computers) had done only #1 for the
> command.
Bullshit.
> That is what is defined for it.
More bullshit, there is no formal definition to what this sequence does.
What counts is what existing applictions do and expect.
> The other items have different commands.
Even more bullshit.
> In looking at CHANGES, I saw the coding was changed back in January.
No need to yell at me.
> and I see no reason for the change.
What is next, get rid of the scrollback buffer because some older
terminals didn't have one?
> Can the original coding please be restored?
No, the new behaviour is correct, and you can use the resize OSC to resize
your window (it has other side effects, however).
--
The choice of a Deliantra, the free code+content MORPG
-----==- _GNU_ http://www.deliantra.net
----==-- _ generation
---==---(_)__ __ ____ __ Marc Lehmann
--==---/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-=====/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\
_______________________________________________
rxvt-unicode mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.schmorp.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rxvt-unicode
