James Cloos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >>>>>> "anhnmncb" == anhnmncb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > anhnmncb> The screenshot is here: http://paste.ubuntu.org.cn/i7978 > > anhnmncb> emacs at the left, and urxvt at the right, from pic, you can > anhnmncb> see Chinese fonts in emacs look compact, urxvt's look too loose. > > It looks like it might be a font size issue. I specify fonts for emacs > and rxvt-unicode using :pixelsize= rather than a point size to try to > keep everything coherent. > > If the font you've specified for Chinese has a smaller pixelsize than > the primary font (ie, the first font in the *font resource) it'll > probably looke like what you get. Refer to urxvt manpage: The first font defines the cell size for characters; other fonts might be smaller, but not (in general) larger. My .Xdefaults is: URxvt.font: xft:Bitstream Vera Sans Mono:pixelsize=16,\ xft:Microsoft YaHei:pixelsize=16,\ xft:WenQuanYi Zen Hei,\ xft:fixed:antialias=false,\ -*-fixed-medium-r-*-*-20-*-*-*-*-*-iso10646-1,\ -*-fixed-medium-r-*-*-15-*-*-*-*-*-iso10646-1
So I dont' think it's relative to pixelsize=. -- Reguards, anhnmncb. PGP key: 44A31344 _______________________________________________ rxvt-unicode mailing list [email protected] http://lists.schmorp.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rxvt-unicode
