On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 04:45:15AM -0500, Russell Harmon <[email protected]>
wrote:
> > in april of last year), so this is definitely worth considering.
> According to https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=405781, the
> bug was fixed and backported all the way to glibc-2.5.20. You may not
> be running the latest bugfix release of glibc-2.7.
There has never been a "2.5-20" release of glibc, glibc doesn't use this
klind of versioning scheme. This looks like redhat-specific thing, and I
don't think it makes sense to require usage of redhat?
> > And so is --open-display... it's a technical term.
> However --open-display is at least two real words. And in a technical
> context, it is more correct than --opendisplay
I disagree?
--
The choice of a Deliantra, the free code+content MORPG
-----==- _GNU_ http://www.deliantra.net
----==-- _ generation
---==---(_)__ __ ____ __ Marc Lehmann
--==---/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ / [email protected]
-=====/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\
_______________________________________________
rxvt-unicode mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.schmorp.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rxvt-unicode
