On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 05:14, Marc Lehmann <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 04:45:15AM -0500, Russell Harmon > <[email protected]> wrote: >> > in april of last year), so this is definitely worth considering. >> According to https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=405781, the >> bug was fixed and backported all the way to glibc-2.5.20. You may not >> be running the latest bugfix release of glibc-2.7. > > There has never been a "2.5-20" release of glibc, glibc doesn't use this > klind of versioning scheme. This looks like redhat-specific thing, and I > don't think it makes sense to require usage of redhat? Hmm... what should I do then? I've been running with a patched urxvtd for a few weeks now without problems and i'm running Gentoo with glibc-2.9_p20081201-r1 (so if it is fixed, i've probably got the fix).
>> > And so is --open-display... it's a technical term. >> However --open-display is at least two real words. And in a technical >> context, it is more correct than --opendisplay > > I disagree? Ok, i'll take out that change. _______________________________________________ rxvt-unicode mailing list [email protected] http://lists.schmorp.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rxvt-unicode
