On p, márc 30, 2012 at 00:52:07 +0200, Marc Lehmann wrote: > On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 04:02:19PM -0500, Yarin <[email protected]> wrote: > > Perhaps you could add an entry to your FAQ (or other similar), > > explaining the presence of this bug and how it might affect users like > > myself (it could save someone else the headache). > > openbsd was never supported in the first place - I am surprised the > multibyte functions are even implemented these days. if rxvt-unicode > compiles, that's great news, if it runs after working around only one libc > bug, that's great enws too, but I suspect that's not the only corruption > and bug you will run into on openbsd,
Others and myself been using urxvt for years now on OpenBSD and never had any problem with it. > the overall implementatioon quality of the openbsd libc is just way > too low. Now you are just talking nonsense... > i really don't want to burden us further with documenting every bug on > ppenbsd, i think it would be far better if they were fixed instead. > > i'm certainly tracking progress there though, so, again, you brought great > news. Let me make this clear for you guys. If OP has a problem with urxvt on OpenBSD, he could've posted this problem on at least two forums for the community, and if the problem really persists, he could've gotten help. Clearly, he has not done so to this day. He can have a broken machine for all we know... So please, stop talking nonsense. Yours, Daniel -- LÉVAI Dániel PGP key ID = 0x83B63A8F Key fingerprint = DBEC C66B A47A DFA2 792D 650C C69B BE4C 83B6 3A8F _______________________________________________ rxvt-unicode mailing list [email protected] http://lists.schmorp.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rxvt-unicode
