On Sat, Sep 15, 2012 at 09:08:21AM -0300, Jim Diamond <[email protected]>
wrote:
> IMHO, tabbedex is considerably superior to tabbed (and I would say
> that about it even without my updates, so I'm not saying this because
> I'm in love with my own code). Is there any way to propose its formal
> inclusion in the distribution?
tabbedex is not included in rxvt-unicode because it isn't maintained by us,
not because of possible lack of quality.
while it is technically possible to include it, does it have actual
advantages? users would get tabbedex by default, but would probably get an
outdated version - the release schedule of tabbedex likely doesn't match the
release cycle of urxvt for example.
the only two ways to improve the rxvt<->tabbedex combination I can think of
at the moment would be:
a) the urxvt and tabbedex maintainers "merge", so it's just one project.
b) urxvt more prominently refers to tabbedex, for example by giving a
recipe to download and use it easily.
--
The choice of a Deliantra, the free code+content MORPG
-----==- _GNU_ http://www.deliantra.net
----==-- _ generation
---==---(_)__ __ ____ __ Marc Lehmann
--==---/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ / [email protected]
-=====/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\
_______________________________________________
rxvt-unicode mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.schmorp.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rxvt-unicode
