On May 19, 2016, at 5:14 PM, André Mantas <andremant...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Regarding the performance discrepancy, could it be that simple_switch.py is > sending more replies per packet_in (packet-out, flow-mod) that > simple_switch_14.py ?
So - given the exception you're getting w.r.t. SwitchFeatures, the virtual Datapaths that cbench implements should never be recognized by Ryu at all; your exception occurs before the Datapath could even make it into MAIN_DISPATCHER state. In this case, your packet_in events from cbench should never receive a reply. Which is why I'm *really* confused why you were able to post performance numbers *at all* for the 1.0 version of simple_switch. I suspect that those performance numbers are wholly invalid - but I have not examined your packet capture. Best, Victor -- Victor J. Orlikowski <> vjo@[cs.]duke.edu ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Mobile security can be enabling, not merely restricting. Employees who bring their own devices (BYOD) to work are irked by the imposition of MDM restrictions. Mobile Device Manager Plus allows you to control only the apps on BYO-devices by containerizing them, leaving personal data untouched! https://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/304595813;131938128;j _______________________________________________ Ryu-devel mailing list Ryu-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ryu-devel
