Hi, On Tuesday, 26.03.2019 at 15:24, Steffen Nurpmeso wrote: > This should not be needed, you should be able to say > > $ make SHELL=/what/you/want VAL_SHELL=/what/you/always/want > > and get along with it. (As long as it is a somewhat compatible > POSIX shell.)
No luck: --- cut here --- Operating system is Linux Checking for basic utility set Setting up configuration options ... done Joining in ./make.rc ... ERROR: invalid syntax in: # Add support for history management. ERROR: invalid syntax in: # Add support for `(un)?bind'ing of key sequences. ERROR: invalid syntax in: # If $OPT_SOCKETS: support for GSS-API (Generic Security Services ERROR: invalid syntax in: # Application Programming Interface) based authentication, e.g., ERROR: invalid syntax in: # Kerberos v5? Available for IMAP and SMTP; can be "require"d. ERROR: invalid syntax in: # If $OPT_SOCKETS: support for IMAP protocol? ERROR: invalid syntax in: # Requires $OPT_ICONV unless $OPT_ALWAYS_UNICODE_LOCALE, in which ERROR: invalid syntax in: # case it only warns. ERROR: invalid syntax in: # (Reading of mails directly on the server) Can be "require"d. ERROR: invalid syntax in: # Enabling the MD5 message digest adds support for several ERROR: invalid syntax in: # authentication possibilities: POP3 (APOP), IMAP and SMTP (CRAM-MD5). ERROR: invalid syntax in: # They can be turned off by excluding MD5. ERROR: invalid syntax in: # If $OPT_SOCKETS: support for parsing of user and password ERROR: invalid syntax in: # credentials from the ~/.netrc file ($NETRC; see *netrc-lookup* ERROR: invalid syntax in: # manual entry). ERROR: invalid syntax in: # If $OPT_SOCKETS: support for POP3 protocol? ERROR: invalid syntax in: # (Download of mails via POP protocol) Can be "require"d. ERROR: invalid syntax in: # If $OPT_SOCKETS: support for SMTP protocol? ERROR: invalid syntax in: # (Directly sending mails over the network) Can be "require"d. ERROR: invalid syntax in: # If $OPT_SOCKETS: support for Secure Socket Layer (Transport Layer ERROR: invalid syntax in: # Security, TLS), i.e., encrypted socket connections; can be ERROR: invalid syntax in: # "require"d. It also automatically enables support for S/MIME ERROR: invalid syntax in: # message signing, verification, en- and decryption. ERROR: invalid syntax in: # This needs the OpenSSL (https://www.openssl.org) or LibreSSL ERROR: invalid syntax in: # (http://www.libressl.org) libraries. ERROR: invalid syntax in: # If $OPT_TLS: shall S-nail (try to) use mechanisms to support ERROR: invalid syntax in: # more digest and cipher algorithms than the few that are ERROR: invalid syntax in: # documented? For S/MIME *smime-cipher* for example this will ERROR: invalid syntax in: # cause EVP_get_cipherbyname(3) to be tried shall the (S-nail-) ERROR: invalid syntax in: # built-in knowledge not suffice to understand the user request. ERROR: invalid syntax in: # Will create a large statically linked binary; dynamically linked ERROR: invalid syntax in: # the costs only arise once the extended lookup is actually needed ERROR: invalid syntax in: # (the first time). Some TLS libraries will always support all ERROR: invalid syntax in: # algorithms. This can be "require"d. .obj/___tmp18: line 74: unexpected EOF while looking for matching ``' .obj/___tmp18: line 77: syntax error: unexpected end of file done ERROR: USE_PKGSYS: 0/n/false/no/off or 1/y/true/yes/on/require, got: make: *** [makefile:22: config] Error 1 --- cut here --- Tried this both with and without a symlink of /bin/sh -> /bin/bash, and also with "env - make config" to rule out any nonsense polluting the environment. > Now you are funny.. A.K.A.: this is mysterious. Are you saying > that dovecot sends complete MBOX- rather than RFC 5322 messages > over IMAP? You see me entirely perplex. I must admit i have not > tested for some time now, as nothing has changed in this area. Ha. Well, it may be that this is some years-old artefact from my migrating from mbox to Maildir on the server, I mean really, like >10 years ago. Having said that, neither mutt, Thunderbird, nor Roundcube have any (visible) problem with my mailboxes. > that is really terrible. But Gunnar Ritters IMAP cache is really > a smart idea, is it? Yes, I've been using Mutt's implementation of this for ages. Cheers, -mato