I can't tell for sure and probably some on the list could give a better answer. IMO, in an engine terminal, some RR would have pretty light rail tracks (from pictures I have seen) and they will run large engine over it. Also may change from one RR to another and/or if the terminal is serving a branch line or main line.
They run at really low speed and are not carrying passengers or revenue service cars to be concern about liability if the engine go off the track. I also think it looks better a on smaller rail anyway. Simon -----Original Message----- From: T Larson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 14, 2004 9:16 PM To: S Scale Subject: [S-Scale Modeling] terminal code I am looking for an opinion (and if you send me an EDUCATED opinion, tell me that!). I'm planning a module with code 100 mainline, code 83 siding, leading to an engine terminal for light steamers, and 1st generation diseasals. Would code 70 make sense for engine terminal, or is that too light? -- Ted Larson I always find things in the last place I look..... Change your membership, change your message settings, use our CALENDAR, view shared files or photos, view the list archives, GO TO http://groups.yahoo.com/group/S-Scale/ Yahoo! Groups Links Change your membership, change your message settings, use our CALENDAR, view shared files or photos, view the list archives, GO TO http://groups.yahoo.com/group/S-Scale/ Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/S-Scale/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
