----- Original Message ----- From: "Chris Palomarez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> . . . . I don't see any reason the S-mod spec should be altered. I feel strongly that Free-moS will extend the existing standard without any alteration . . . . . . . > > > > > > Sounds to me like some people have to get together off this list and take the time to sort out what is required and what is only traditional in the S-Mod system. Then they need to look at the principles of the Fre-Mo system and see if there really is a contradiction, and report back to us I'll admit not having read every word of every pro-Fre-Mo posting, but I wonder if it really does require a different height of railhead above the floor, a different, incompatible electrical connection, or an incompatible way of joining track of one modula to another. If none of those contradictions really exist, then it's just a different philosophy on how to put modules together and operate, and we can move. Tom Hawley -- Lansing Mich
Change your membership, change your message settings, use our CALENDAR, view shared files or photos, view the list archives, GO TO http://groups.yahoo.com/group/S-Scale/ Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/S-Scale/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
