> I find visible yards a design feature i'm not interested 
> in devoting space and other resources to. 

David:

Not at all a heresy. In fact, much as Ed and I have lampooned some of 
the foibles of the Layout Design groupies, this is one of their hot 
buttons. Indeed, your notion is far more in vogue than you might 
realize. Layouts need neither be focused on yards, nor comprised of a 
series of endless micro waypoints for the local. There is indeed a 
minor trend toward recognizing the realism of operating singular, non-
yard locations...and more layouts following this sort of theme.

Consider Bill Schleicher's layout as an excellent example...an 
example you may know from recent RMC exposure and through the web at: 
http://users.ntplx.net/~branch/).

Bill is one of the chief folks behind Branchline Trains (custom 
painted runs of factory models and now producing its own HO models). 
Bill's layout focuses on NYO&W at Livingston Manor. Though not a yard 
per se, it is almost as big and busy as some of our model adaptations 
of larger yards. The Manor hosted helpers and served as one of the 
turn-around points for locals coming into town from either direction. 
At one point, the Manor was also one of the terminus' for the 
summertime resort trains - running a record number of sections (36 or 
so on one Labor day) of these trains especially on the big weekends 
like July 4th and Labor Day. O&W fans also enjoy the rather heavy 
overhead traffic that ran through this location from Scranton - coal, 
merchandise, and especially "beefers" - reefers full of meat - on 
it's way to New England through that nexus of northeastern 
prototypes - Maybrook - one of the busiest marshalling yards in the 
East. Finally, there were remnants of a once vibrant milk traffic 
into New York.

And all this action and variety Bill captures through a single, 
reasonably sized location....oh, he did add Roscoe just up the line 
as well to give a sense of "going somewhere". He could have picked 
other locations on the road...like Campbell Hall or Walton, but 
picked this for its particular flavor and variety. He picked well in 
my view. A great sort of location to focus on for a small, but very 
successful layout. 

Look for his work (http://users.ntplx.net/~branch/) in the Railroad 
Model Craftsman article devoted to his layout and the scratchbuilt 
locomotives and cars of Mal Houck last spring. Great work! Recommend 
the NYO&W society is as great a set of modellers, a great bunch of 
guys, an avid archivist, and an excellent roast beef dinner (annual 
dinner).

These are great modellers and a clever layout. With their thorough 
understanding of what the railroad actually did at the modelled 
location, Bill manages through selective omission and even more 
selective spots modelled 1:1  - to lend his scenes the sort of 
authenticity so many aim for. Bill lets the visitor's eye fill in the 
rest. Wow! 

Similar locations exist on many Railroads...and frequently modellers 
capture a slice of these on their layouts...but seldom do they focus 
strictly on turning this side dish into a main course of its own. 
Partly this is due to the fact that most locations of this sort seem 
inevitably to have either morphed larger into yards or languished 
back into brush. Many roads seemed to have had these locations...but 
inevitably photographers seemed to have gravitated either to where 
the action was thicker or to locations closer to their homes. Phil 
Hastings and a few others ventured further. If perchance you've 
already found one on your favorite prototype...be happy and build 
before your resolve weakens.

Skip







Change your membership, change your message settings, use our CALENDAR, view 
shared files or photos, view the list archives, GO TO  
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/S-Scale/ 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/S-Scale/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 



Reply via email to