Hi Ed, et al, Not upset at all with your previous comments. I would just argue that we don't even need a definition of TP/HR/SC, because they are in effect moving forward on converging lines, like a real railroad track off into the sunset. What is important, IMHP, is what you said elsewhere in your post: the S modeler today has a variety of choices, and that is what we need to focus on as we help newcomers learn the hobby. I try to tell them to not worry about what category they might be in, just to pick the equipment they like, can afford, what level of detailing and scenery they desire, and have fun with it. And, of course, suggest sources. Cheers :) Roy
> From: Edward Loizeaux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Tue, 04 Oct 2005 13:13:00 -0700 > To: "List, S scale" <[email protected]> > Subject: [S-Scale Modeling] Hi-rail daffynitions......... > > > Anyway, there is my 4 cents worth (double anyone else, groan) and also a > more clear description of my thoughts regarding hi-rail Again, my > apologies to anyone who was upset with my prior statement regarding the > decision making abilities of hi-railers. To REPLY to the list, use REPLY ALL; to reply to the sender, use REPLY. For those of you on DIGEST mode, all REPLY messages go to the list (remember to edit the SUBJECT of your message). Change message settings, use our CALENDAR or LINKS, view shared files or photos, view the list archives, GO TO http://groups.yahoo.com/group/S-Scale/ Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/S-Scale/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
