Hey John; Well, he is one of 745 members of the S Scale list. Surely you don't require 100% agreement to avoid discouragement?
There are probably others who agree, but even then he didn't say S shouldn't grow, just that if it became "very popular" it might well change in ways he (and others) might not like. What is "very popular", rivaling HO? Not likely to happen. O scale is still pretty small, but has a good variety that would be great to see in S. Approaching or rivaling the availability of product in scale O would definitely be a wonderful state for S, and would retain the "small group, not everyone does this" dynamic that is an appeal of S along with the size. Pieter --- John Degnan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This comment (quoted below) has got to be the > biggest discouragement to my interest in and > involvement with S scale. Now I feel like I'm > pis*ing upwind... > > > John Degnan > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: meldridge2000 > To: [email protected] > Sent: May 17, 2007 11:44 PM > Subject: {S-Scale List} Re: S's future > > > I may be a little out of the main stream on this, > but if S grew very > popular, I'd probably change to another scale. We > probably take for > granted the benefits of being a small group. > > [Non-text portions of this message have been > removed] > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/S-Scale/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional <*> To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/S-Scale/join (Yahoo! ID required) <*> To change settings via email: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
