I can relate to the sort of "elite" status of working in a relatively
obscure scale whose inner workings are nearly incomprehensible to the
average person. It is sort of nice to be special.

On the other hand, N scale has just two track heights in general use: Code
55 and code 80 (I believe it is 80, maybe it is 88...). Anyway, virtually
every N gauge/scale engine or piece of rolling stock ever made will work
with today's track and turnouts. And someone correct me if I'm wrong, but
isn't N a more recent addition to the modeling world than S? And isn't there
more available in N than in S, even though it is a relative newcomer? There
are reasons for that, and it ain't all about price.

For me, I could forego the convoluted aspect of dealing with 4~5 different
types of wheelsets and the same number (or more) of types of track and
turnouts. I could, therefore, spend more time on developing a layout.

Observe the growth of On30. What a phenomenon! One track gauge, HO, which is
close enough for all but the most hardened rivet counters, and one type of
turnout fits all engines and rolling stock. There is On30 track designed for
the purpose, and I suppose the scale folks would go that route. And look at
all the equipment and structures that are available for a gauge/scale that
is, what a decade old? Price of course has a very large bearing. But so does
efficiency.

S is anything but efficient and easy, for newbies especially. In point of
fact, I know of at least two local S modelers that have switched to On30
exclusively.

Roy Inman

From: Bill Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 29 May 2007 16:54:43 -0400
To: 'ctxmf74' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [email protected]
Subject: RE: {S-Scale List} Re: Tom's proposal (turnouts)


Hi Dave,

Yes indeed, as long as one is buying new equipment, it is certainly possible
to buy it all to match.

For those of us not ready to buy that much new equipment, the turnout issue
comes back in play.

Of course, the old style flanges are not very handsome. The real scale
wheels do look better to my eyes. It winds up something of a quandary and a
compromise. The question I was answering is not a "Why not do it this way?"
question. It was a question of whether on not anyone did it the other way. I
do and so do others.

Simplification is always a thorny issue. I suspect that few of us on the
sale list really want it simple. If we did, we would opt for the tinplate
stuff that lacks all manner of 3D detail. Instead, we seek our own level of
comfort with detail versus fragility versus cost (and probably more
dimensions than that).

Bill

Reply from Bill Porter

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] <mailto:S-Scale%40yahoogroups.com>
[mailto:[email protected] <mailto:S-Scale%40yahoogroups.com> ] On
Behalf Of
ctxmf74
Sent: Tuesday, May 29, 2007 4:26 PM
To: [email protected] <mailto:S-Scale%40yahoogroups.com>
Subject: {S-Scale List} Re: Tom's proposal (turnouts)

--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:S-Scale%40yahoogroups.com> .com, "Bill
Porter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The "Just Swap The Wheels" argument is pretty good for SHS It is a
mediocre argument for
> American models . It is wrong for converting American Flyer
> steamers since no such scale wheels are available.

Hi Bill, The swap the wheels arguement can go both ways. If you
have large flange equipment you want to run why not put the large
flange wheels on the rest of the scale equipment and use switches to
suit? Most newer stuff is available with both large and small flange
wheels. If half of the equipment is scale flanged and half is flyer
flanged then why wouldn't it look just as good to have all flyer
flanged and simplify the track construction?.....dave

__ 

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

  




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/S-Scale/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/S-Scale/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 

Reply via email to