Greg said:
> Join the club.
Et tu Brute?
<snip: S scale and On30>
> On30 is a caricature scale IMHO, buildings can be smaller but still O and
> it
> can be done on the cheap.
Agree. I was only out to capture the "feel" of Colo 1890s narrow gauge.
Love the "cheap" part of current On30. However, with diecast MMI stuff and
$300+ Bachman releases... it ain't gonna' be cheap much longer.
> Also have you considered doing Colorado NG in Sn3?
Yes. That was the direction I first went when I decided to give 1890s Colo
NG a whirl. Turned out to be way too labor intensive and expensive... in
addition to not gaining much "mass" over HO standard gauge.
Thanks for the thoughts Greg.
Dave said:
> Hi Andre, No help here! I'm in the same boat.
You too????
My lands, we're all a pitiful lot, aren't we?????
> I guess it's similiar to liking all the women you see but layouts can't
> smack you
> upside the head to get you back on track.
Oooo... dangerous analogy there, Dave, my boy.
> I've played around with all the scales a bit and have decided that S is
> the
> ideal size for modern era standard gauge and that O is best for old
> time and narrow gauge...
I agree!
> ...so i'll probably build a modern era S scale standard gauge line to
> compliment
> my P48 old time line
Well... that's one solution. I'm just concerned that I don't have enough
modeling "ooomph" left in me to tackle two layout projects.
Good luck Dave!
Andre Ming
Poteau, OK
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/S-Scale/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/S-Scale/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
