Pieter,

I caught a bug over the weekend so these semi-legal drugs are having 
their effect.  Yes you are right about turning the engine around, my 
mistake.  All this world needs is just a little more confusion.   What  
I should have added was the ability of then returning that pusher engine 
light back down the hill, or even just putting it into a siding without 
affecting the other train. This is generally not easily done.  I guess I 
was flash backing to my days with Dynatrol where I did wire several 
engines backward to make up loco sets, if they had the same address. 

Bob Werre




Pieter Roos wrote:

> Hi Bob;
>
> Boy, are we mis-communicating.
>
> You said that with two rail DC one could not simulate the N&W practice 
> of running  a steam helper tender-first without re-wiring the model to 
> run backwards. I was pointing out that you are incorrect, you can flip 
> any two rail DC engine around and place it back on the track and it 
> will continue to run the same direction on the track it was running 
> before, just like you can turn around a diesel unit to make an A-B-A 
> set and it will run "backwards" while the lead unit runs "forward" 
> without changing the wiring. Flip it around again and run the A units 
> "elephant style", again without changing the wiring. No DCC involved 
> in that case.
>
> I'm not complaining at all about DCC, there are plenty of things you 
> CAN do with it that are impossible or difficult with two rail DC. It's 
> just your example of running one steam engine "backwards" as a helper 
> while the others run forward is not valid.
>
> Pieter Roos
>
> Bob Werre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>     Pieter,
>     I do believe you are mistaken. As example take your ABA setup. When
>     you setup your lashup set the A & B to run in the same direction
>     and MU
>     them. Next set up the trailing A unit to run backward and couple
>     to the
>     AB set, next just MU it to the consist. Everything should run
>     together. I run the same setup with SHS F units all the time. In this
>     way the lead unit will have all it's lights functioning and the
>     trailing
>     unit will only have a headlight in reverse. I also have a set of RR
>     FT's and a lone F-7 that I run as ABA or AAB as the need arises. I'm
>     not sure about the convenience of all the various systems (Digitrax
>     operator here) but I would guess I can make or break a consist in
>     well
>     under a minute in any combination of directions.
>
>     I've personally only tried running a mid engine helper once, in that
>     case I didn't mu them, just used the other throttle (dual 400 units)
>     and it worked okay. My layout doesn't run that long a train, unless
>     they join by accident (accidental mid train non helper in this
>     case). I
>     have used rear helpers more often when an engine is stalling, I can
>     easily send an engine up the rear, MU it and off we go. Just this
>     past
>     weekend, on my major grade the drive shaft on one of the FT's started
>     slipping, so I sent a Sunset GP-9 for a little help. An hour later
>     and
>     a replaced drive knuckle and the FT's were doing fine by
>     themselves. I
>     typically run trains of 10-16 cars with 20 being the max. for my
>     sidings, so it's a thing I do just to get practice. Now our Houston S
>     Gaugers modules have run many trains much longer, but because
>     there are
>     no grades there's not much need to worry about helper districts.
>
>     Bob Werre
>     BobWphoto.com
>
>
>
>
>
>
>     Pieter Roos wrote:
>
>     > Ahhhh, Bob;
>     >
>     > Lets think about this for a second. Did you ever have to wire an F
>     > unit backward to make up an A-B-A loco set? On two rail DC every
>     > correctly wired locomotive will run the same direction,
>     regardless of
>     > facing. So, while DCC has lots of advantages over plain DC, this
>     > doesn't happen to be one of them. More to the point is that mid or
>     > rear train helpers can actually be operated as on the real
>     railroad,
>     > by a different crew and at different speeds if required. Also,
>     models
>     > with different gearing can be run together more easily than with DC
>     > systems. The ability to run some units facing the opposite way
>     is NOT
>     > an advantage of DCC.
>     >
>     > Pieter Roos
>     >
>     >
>     >
>
>
>
>
>     [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
>
>



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/S-Scale/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/S-Scale/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 

Reply via email to