Hi Andre;
I would say either option 1. (illegible faded signage) or 4. (no signage) with
possibly "new" either restored or generic but fresh signage in the margins.
With paper it would be easy to add the fresh signs over the faded ones if the
user so wished, but there is no issue with "wrong" signs on the building
itself. I think these look great, BTW!
Pieter E. Roos
Railroad Home Page at
www.geocities.com/pieter_roos/pieter_1.html
--- On Mon, 9/8/08, Andre Ming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
From: Andre Ming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: {S-Scale List} PhotoFlat Opinions Sought
To: [email protected]
Date: Monday, September 8, 2008, 11:12 PM
Hi All:
Got a few questions for those of you that would be interested in brick-type
industrial building flats. Mainly, my question falls in the realm of
signage. Which would you be more interested in:
1. Retain any faded signage as long as it's illegible (which is often the
case), thus the building is generic.
2. Restore original signage.
3. Resign faded signage with "generic" signage. (i.e. "Central
Distributing
Co." as oppossed to "Kansas City Distributing Co.")
4. Remove signage completely, i.e. no signage. (Truly generic.)
What say ye?
Input appreciated.
Andre Ming
------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/S-Scale/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/S-Scale/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
