Jace is correct about the "phony" lettering, but, the PRR did have over
10,000 and the PRR is in the TOP 3 railroads modeled. A C G screwed up with
the K-5, could have changed a K-4 slightly every couple of yrs ( "new style
pilot", drop coupler w/door, Coast to Coast tender, etc ) and who knows.
Jim "lovin' livin' on the Pennsy Main" Lyle
In a message dated 6/1/2011 6:11:51 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
[email protected] writes:
Not to beat the matter to death, but Don is confirming what I had already
suspected about his marketing decision.
A PRR H8/9/10 is a splendid animal (and I may well buy a kit if BTS
completes that project) but there is no question
of its identity: it will never be anything except PRR. Only a very few
were ever resold for use elsewhere, such as
the Western Allegheny. To letter an H8/9/10 for any other class I road
has a strong tinplatish flavor.
Jace Kahn
General Manager
Ceres & Canisteo RR Co./Champlain County Traction Co.
> I know our ex-LIRR engineer Howie would have loved that as he fired
> several different classes of H's. But we thought the B&O would look a
> bit more generic and if you squint, you can see those other roads (you
> do not have to squint so much as to miss that center rail in "O"). We
> considered the B&O E-24 (which the PRR also had), but I thought the
> domes did not look as modern as the E-27. The funny thing was picking
> out numbers for our models. Although the B&O had almost 500 E-27s, by
> the time WWII ended, they had been retrofitted so many times that it
> was hard to find 2 that looked exactly the same. The B&O converted
> about 100 of these into L-2 0-8-0s. Then there was the head end
> brakeman. Road engines after the war had to had a third seat added to
> the cab for the head end brakeman. This made the fireman's cab side
> different. Originally, these had a single air pump on the fireman's
> side. At some point, either a 2nd air pump was added or a compound
> pump. And the piping...each engine was piped a little different. So
> we tried to find as many photos as possible of both sides of the
> engine to pick the 3 numbers out that we needed for our B&Os.
> Don
>
> On Jun 1, 2011, at 12:28 PM, Peter Vanvliet wrote:
>
> > So, Don, why did you not proceed with a PRR version of the 2-8-0? Are
> > there more B&O modelers in S than PRR modelers?
> >
> > - Peter.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/S-Scale/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/S-Scale/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
[email protected]
[email protected]
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[email protected]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
