Not considering the legality for a moment: A person should be able to opt out of having his/her address and phone number, email, etc., included in the directory. Giving a person that option is IMHO, just an old-fashioned common courtesy.
Roy Inman From: grchud <[email protected]> Reply-To: S-Scale <[email protected]> Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2012 15:43:09 -0400 To: S-Scale <[email protected]> Subject: {S-Scale List} Re: Member Directory Member Directory <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/S-Scale/message/91230;_ylc=X3oDMTJxanJ2bjltBF 9TAzk3MzU5NzE1BGdycElkAzI1MjE5MARncnBzcElkAzE3MDUzNDY3MzEEbXNnSWQDOTEyMzAEc2 VjA2Rtc2cEc2xrA3Ztc2cEc3RpbWUDMTM1MTA3ODc3Ng--> I applaud the attempt to replace the print directory with something related to modeling regardless of the quality issues, which can be easily corrected. What I am disappointed about is the elimination of the online member directory, which I found to be quite useful. Here's hoping it returns in a form as helpful as the old one. Ed Kozlowsky Whether the membership list is in the Dispatch or on the NASG website, how does it violate one¹s privacy if the person agrees to have it published? If they don¹t want it published, so state in the annual membership form. KISS! Am I missing something here? I personally don¹t have any qualms about my address and phone number being published, but I can understand there are those who don¹t. A simple case in point being the local telephone directory. Are those listed liable for legal action? If so, what has our legal system come to? Don¹t bother to tell me, I already know! Take a look at Congress and our court system. Gary Chudzinski
<<attachment: image.png>>
