Bob, It’s great to know that my kits are being built instead of in a holding pattern under my layout. Sorry I sold you an unprototypical car: it was not intentional! I still have many more unbuilt kits that I dream of completing, but am finally beginning to accept that I need no more freight cars on my layout.
Roger Nulton From: Bob McCarthy Sent: Monday, October 29, 2012 2:04 PM To: [email protected] Subject: {S-Scale List} Kinsman updated in many cases not possible because they are not correct Tom, et al, When transiting from Sn3 to S, I bought from Roger Nulton several of the KINSMAN kits he had as excess. My observations are similar, however the SF boxcar I built has a huge problem for anyone trying to build a representative car. It only became apparent when Chris Rooney sent some images of the boxcars to me. The kit uses a random end and spacer blocks to fit for a boxcar that is substantially shorter than the real boxcar. Kit was fun to build as it reminded me of AMBROID HO kits that I built in high school in the 1960's. There is no correcting the SF car as all the side parts, doors, and ends are for a shorter car than the prototype. It builds a nice faux SF car and nothing more. Fun to build a KINSMAN kit, but so far none are much more than where things were at in 1970 in S. Bob McCarthy -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: richgajnak <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Sent: Monday, October 29, 2012 4:52 PM Subject: Re: {S-Scale List} Kinsman updated Sorry Tom, one of those little voices in my head told me to say that. :-) It's been over 20 years since I built a Kinsman kit, but as I remember, the sides, ends, roof and floor are sized and squared pretty well. They do make pretty nice models as is. If I were to build one today, I'd probably just replace the brake detail with Grandt Line parts and the soft wire with brass wire. As long as you don't paint them shocking pink or electric lime green, they blend in pretty well with today's stuff, even with the crude detail of yesteryear. It's mostly a matter of taking your time and test fitting pieces as you go. Rich G(ajnak) --- In mailto:S-Scale%40yahoogroups.com, Thomas Baker <bakert@...> wrote: > > Rich, > > Right I know, but in my case--and I may be alone--pitfalls always surface. > One needs to be aware of little tricks and techniques that avoid the > pitfalls. I think it would be instructive to work parallel to someone who is > working on the same project as I. At the end, a photo of the result might be > fun to share on the group list. It may be that most modelers are way past all > this. > > Tom > > -----Original Message----- > From: mailto:S-Scale%40yahoogroups.com > [mailto:mailto:S-Scale%40yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of richgajnak > Sent: Monday, October 29, 2012 3:21 PM > To: mailto:S-Scale%40yahoogroups.com > Subject: Re: {S-Scale List} Kinsman updated > > > > --- In mailto:S-Scale%40yahoogroups.com, Thomas Baker <bakert@> wrote: > > > > After an exhausting back and forth about Lionel wheels and what will happen > > if its wheels are not scale, how about a discussion on old kits and how to > > update them. By "old," I mean KINSMAN, Scenery Unlimited, Mainline, JC, and > > others, possibly even early AM. I have two KINSMAN seven-panel box cars and > > two cattle cars, one Northeastern and one Ambroid. I think they're really > > the same. I have yet to build them but would like to partner over the > > internet from time to time with another person who wants to jump in. Got > > some ideas for updating the kit? Just an idea. > > > > Tom > It's very easy, Tom. > > Just replace all the wood and metal parts in a Kinsman kit with contemporary > equivalents. > > Rich G(ajnak) > > > > ------------------------------------ > > Yahoo! Groups Links >
