--- In [email protected], Michael Greene <mgreene@...> wrote:
>
> Ben
>
> Glad to hear it is running.
>
> Ken might want to consider 1:16 scale (aka 3/4 scale) -- a much better
> scale for tired eyes and/or finer detail, and an even larger windmill than S
> at which to tilt!! :-) A small but growing scale (where have I heard that
> before?)
>
> regards
> Michael Greene
>
I've found 1:1 scale offers almost the best detail and fidelity. The only
downside is it takes up a wee bit more space and it's pretty hard getting it
out of the box.
Rich G(ajnak)
------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/S-Scale/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/S-Scale/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
[email protected]
[email protected]
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[email protected]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
