I did 36 years of 1:1 modeling, and believe me, I like 3/16 a whole lot better.
boB Nicholson __________________________________________________ --- In [email protected], "richgajnak" <rustytraque@...> wrote: > > > > --- In [email protected], Michael Greene <mgreene@> wrote: > > > > Ben > > > > Glad to hear it is running. > > > > Ken might want to consider 1:16 scale (aka 3/4 scale) -- a much better > > scale for tired eyes and/or finer detail, and an even larger windmill than > > S at which to tilt!! :-) A small but growing scale (where have I heard that > > before?) > > > > regards > > Michael Greene > > > I've found 1:1 scale offers almost the best detail and fidelity. The only > downside is it takes up a wee bit more space and it's pretty hard getting it > out of the box. > > Rich G(ajnak) > ------------------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/S-Scale/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional <*> To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/S-Scale/join (Yahoo! ID required) <*> To change settings via email: [email protected] [email protected] <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [email protected] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
