I've been taking time between layouts after our move to upgrade cars including 
reducing slack in the 802s by the method included in the instructions.  The rod 
inside the spring restricts the side-to-side action of the coupler.  I think 
the amount of the restriction depends upon the length of the rod and if the rod 
is too short then there is no reduction in the back-and-forth slack or the 
reduction in slack is not worth the effort.  Assembling the couplers with the 
rod in the spring is yet another learned art of eye-hand coordination.  Those 
little rods just love to slide out of the spring if you tip it the wrong way 
from the bench to the coupler box.  Testing coupled cars with the reduced slack 
on Lionel's AF FastTrack curve has not revealed a problem with restricted 
side-to-side.  

My first field test of the modified couplers was on Ken's layout with the 24 
coal porters.  It was great to see the train start without all the slack and 
the associated noise.
Ben Trousdale

--- In [email protected], "richgajnak" <rustytraque@...> wrote:
>
> 
> I started to double up the centering springs about a year ago.  It seems to 
> reduce the slack bouncy-bouncy quite a bit with no ill effects.  I don't know 
> if it affects the magnetic uncoupling, I only do manual uncoupling.
> 
> Rich G(ajnak)
> 
> 
> --- In [email protected], North Stratford <nsrc119@> wrote:
> >
> > Group,
> > According to the instructions packaged with Kadee couplers, it is possible 
> > to reduce/eliminate the slack action, see attached illustration.
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > Matt Hogan
> >
>




------------------------------------

Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/S-Scale/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/S-Scale/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    [email protected] 
    [email protected]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to