Is it possible to keep several S3QL file systems in a single bucket? If so, is it wise to do so?
It looks like it should be possible because of the way objects are named, but while playing around, I accidentally created two file systems in one S3 compatible bucket and eventually they became unmountable. But like I said, I was just playing, and may have done something else to damage them. Another question, is there anything in S3QL that would prevent one from accidentally mounting a filesystem twice (on different computers)? Thanks, Rich -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "s3ql" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
