Super Strobi <strobis...@gmail.com> writes:
> **In summary**: is this setup supported by S3QL: local storage backend by
> NFS share?
Yes, that should work.
Not sure why you're having performance issues. I'd try to isolate the
problem. For example, does the same thing happen if you use the local
backend? Or use the NFS backend, but don't export the mountpoint via
CIFS or NFS?
Best,
-Nikolaus
--
GPG encrypted emails preferred. Key id: 0xD113FCAC3C4E599F
Fingerprint: ED31 791B 2C5C 1613 AF38 8B8A D113 FCAC 3C4E 599F
»Time flies like an arrow, fruit flies like a Banana.«
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"s3ql" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to s3ql+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
