On May 18 2015, Maxim Kostrikin <[email protected]> wrote:
> It more like feature request.
> I have a huge s3ql mounts 2-4T and big meta-data db 10-20GB
> Each have archived data ( logs mostly ), I do not add there any new files.
> Some times users user those files.
> If I have a server/network issue, s3ql usually fail and I need to run long
> ( 6hours+ ) fsck and then remount it back.
>
> *What if I have read only mode so If s3ql mount fails, restoring it would
> cost nothing regard fsck.*
This is correct. But I think it would be better to fix the
server/network issues. What are those?
Best,
-Nikolaus
--
GPG encrypted emails preferred. Key id: 0xD113FCAC3C4E599F
Fingerprint: ED31 791B 2C5C 1613 AF38 8B8A D113 FCAC 3C4E 599F
»Time flies like an arrow, fruit flies like a Banana.«
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"s3ql" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
