On Mar 09 2016, Cliff Stanford <[email protected]> wrote:
> Just one thing, I'm not sure it's sensible to push the metadata to
> "infrequent access" as it is accessed rather frequently. Maybe just
> the actual data?
Would be a nice theoretically, but I think the benefits don't justify
the added complexity. It's not as if the IA class is slower, it just has
smaller availability guarantees. And finally, metadata is only accessed
on mount, umount and every 24h. So depending on your usage pattern, this
may be a lot less frequent than file contents.
Best,
-Nikolaus
--
GPG encrypted emails preferred. Key id: 0xD113FCAC3C4E599F
Fingerprint: ED31 791B 2C5C 1613 AF38 8B8A D113 FCAC 3C4E 599F
»Time flies like an arrow, fruit flies like a Banana.«
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"s3ql" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
