On Apr 22 2016, Daniel Jagszent <[email protected]> wrote:
> 6 million files on the S3QL file system might be a little bit much. For
> me problems (e.g. very slow directory listings) started with ~ 2 million
> files but that probably depends on the hardware of your machine (CPU
> speed, amount of RAM and speed of local disk).
Guys, would you please stop assuming that undesired behavior is
intentional and/or unfixable?
If you get anything but O(n * log n) performance, you have probably
found a bug. Please measure the performance you are getting (e.g. time
required for 500 k files, 1 m files, 2 m files, for both S3QL and some
local file system), and report the numbers (instead of "very
slow"). Don't silently assume that things are meant to be that way.
Best,
-Nikolaus
--
GPG encrypted emails preferred. Key id: 0xD113FCAC3C4E599F
Fingerprint: ED31 791B 2C5C 1613 AF38 8B8A D113 FCAC 3C4E 599F
»Time flies like an arrow, fruit flies like a Banana.«
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"s3ql" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
