Thanks Ant for looking into our podling! On Jun 3, 2013, at 10:55 , ant elder wrote:
> It would be good to hear from the mentors, the status page lists those as > Patrick and Arun, is that up-to-date? This is up to date. > > Does anyone have any thoughts on TLP vs sub project? Are there any reasons > not to be a TLP? TLP seems the appropriate choice here. I don't see what project S4 could be subproject of, nor why. For graduation we'd have to clarify the naming issue. I see you just commented on another project's podling name search: "Once the information is collected and collated, then ask the trademark team to help interpret and analyse these results on the private lists, copying in the PPMC. Finally discuss the results of your investigation on the private PPMC list. ". This looks like a plan! Thanks, Matthieu > > ...ant > > On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 5:44 PM, Flavio Junqueira > <[email protected]>wrote: > >> Graduation would be nice, but there is the question of destination. >> Assuming that this community agrees with graduation, are we going to be >> top-level next? We also need to hear form our mentors how they feel about >> it. >> >> -Flavio >> >> >> On May 31, 2013, at 11:44 AM, ant elder <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Hi S4 Dev's, I'm from the Incubator PMC and doing some reviews of the >> older >>> Incubator podlings and if there's anything that can be done to help them >>> graduate. >>> >>> Benson asked back in December last year and the suggestion was to look at >>> it after the next release, which has happened now. Graduating now would >>> help avoid all the problems you had getting binding release votes. From >> my >>> looking about the podling it looks ready to go, is there anything holding >>> you up? >>> >>> ...ant >> >>
