Hallo Pavel,
__________________________________________________________________________
Thursday, July 12, 2001, 10:55:31 AM, you wrote:
PH> DOM interface names are normative and must say, I'm not a friend of
PH> aliases/overloads you propose.
Okay. I thought that the names, offered by me, are described in
dom.idl (Appendix B: IDL Definitions), and the names with get' and
set' are described in org/w3c/dom/Node.java (Appendix C: Java
Language Binding). Unless not so? The names of implementation in Perl
should base on "Appendix C: Java Language Binding"?
__________________________________________________________________________
Alles Gutes,
Albert mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
