You've got me, I have to check it. I'll let you know, I'm in rush these
days.
P
Albert N. MICHEEV wrote:
> Hallo Pavel,
> __________________________________________________________________________
> Thursday, July 12, 2001, 10:55:31 AM, you wrote:
>
> PH> DOM interface names are normative and must say, I'm not a friend of
> PH> aliases/overloads you propose.
>
> Okay. I thought that the names, offered by me, are described in
> dom.idl (Appendix B: IDL Definitions), and the names with get' and
> set' are described in org/w3c/dom/Node.java (Appendix C: Java
> Language Binding). Unless not so? The names of implementation in Perl
> should base on "Appendix C: Java Language Binding"?
> __________________________________________________________________________
> Alles Gutes,
> Albert mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
--
Pavel Hlavnicka
Ginger Alliance
www.gingerall.com
