Hi Martin!
On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 11:45:09PM +0200, Martin Rubey wrote:
> Although I am now relieved that I didn't break anything, let me add one
> other idea: in the unittesting package for fricas, two things turned out
> to be very useful:
>
> 1) being able to mark tests as "expected to fail"
That's certainly a nice too, but I would not advocate this in our
situation, or at least not for patches not in "under review": indeed,
if we go this way we will end up doing a lot of temporary edits in
places not necessarily directly related with the patch under
consideration, and this which will end up creating lots of conflicts.
> 2) a statistic
>
> how many tests were run
> how many failed, but should have passed
> how many passed, but were expected to have failed.
That could be useful indeed if someone finds a good setup for this.
Cheers,
Nicolas
--
Nicolas M. Thiéry "Isil" <[email protected]>
http://Nicolas.Thiery.name/
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-combinat-devel" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-combinat-devel?hl=en.
