On Sun, Jul 22, 2012 at 10:44:36AM +0200, Martin Rubey wrote:
> I am not completely sure I see your point: do you mean, that it is often
> the case that a doctest fails because of a *different* patch? And once
> that one is fixed, the patch owner would modify his own?
My typical use case: I work on a low level feature in file A, like
improving category stuff. Along the way, my change triggers some
failure in some doctests in some other not directly related file B:
typically some output was changed syntactically though it is
semantically equivalent, and things might evolve further; or maybe I
am not sure yet whether the change is desirable or not. In doubt, I
prefer not to touch file B at this point in time, to avoid creating
conflicts with other patches lower in the queue.
Cheers,
Nicolas
--
Nicolas M. Thiéry "Isil" <[email protected]>
http://Nicolas.Thiery.name/
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-combinat-devel" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-combinat-devel?hl=en.
