Well, this is not exactly true, as the latex method is not modified in my patch. I only introduce new methods (written just before the latex method indeed)
Is there any conflict with my patch when you apply the queue in full ? does it say that it need to be rebased ? or is there just a hunk ? I wonder if this is a good idea to put your patches right in the middle of the series file.. Cheers, Frederic Le jeudi 20 décembre 2012 18:40:10 UTC+1, Jean-Baptiste Priez a écrit : > > I try to implement some hopf algebra: > > - FQSym > - WQSym > - PQSym > - PBT > > The 3 firsts are in #13793 (no dependance in combinat) and PBT in #13855 > (depends of binary_trees). > > To build these Hopf algebra, I implemented two new combinatoric objets : > PackedWord for WQSym and ParkingFunctions for PQSym. > > FQSym is clean I think... with some bases. > > Please comment and help me to improve that. > > Jean-Baptiste Priez (phd student of F. Hivert and N.M. Thiéry) > (Humm... Sorry for my bad english) > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-combinat-devel" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sage-combinat-devel/-/6o_Hdm_LDJsJ. To post to this group, send email to sage-combinat-devel@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-combinat-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-combinat-devel?hl=en.
