I put my patch at the top of the queue and it's ok. (It was just a hunk). Cheers,
Jean-Baptiste Le samedi 29 décembre 2012 11:28:33 UTC+1, Frédéric Chapoton a écrit : > > Well, this is not exactly true, as the latex method is not modified in my > patch. I only introduce new methods (written just before the latex method > indeed) > > Is there any conflict with my patch when you apply the queue in full ? > does it say that it need to be rebased ? or is there just a hunk ? > > I wonder if this is a good idea to put your patches right in the middle of > the series file.. > > Cheers, > > Frederic > > Le jeudi 20 décembre 2012 18:40:10 UTC+1, Jean-Baptiste Priez a écrit : >> >> I try to implement some hopf algebra: >> >> - FQSym >> - WQSym >> - PQSym >> - PBT >> >> The 3 firsts are in #13793 (no dependance in combinat) and PBT in #13855 >> (depends of binary_trees). >> >> To build these Hopf algebra, I implemented two new combinatoric objets : >> PackedWord for WQSym and ParkingFunctions for PQSym. >> >> FQSym is clean I think... with some bases. >> >> Please comment and help me to improve that. >> >> Jean-Baptiste Priez (phd student of F. Hivert and N.M. Thiéry) >> (Humm... Sorry for my bad english) >> > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-combinat-devel" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sage-combinat-devel/-/YE57dN0RnNUJ. To post to this group, send email to sage-combinat-devel@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-combinat-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-combinat-devel?hl=en.
