Hi Matthew,

Thanks for your interest and request for more background to decide
what's the right thing to do.

Sage-Combinat started back in 2008, as a reincarnation of a similar
project MuPAD-Combinat (we switched the underlying platform from MuPAD
to Sage). At some point Sage-Combinat was a tightly knit group of
about 30 people working together on the core combinatorics feature;
this required tight coordination and a common location for sharing
in-development code (which was the Sage-Combinat queue). With time,
the breath of features have widened a lot, with interactions with many
other areas of Sage. Also the switch to git and the emergence of "Sage
packages" made it much easier for smaller groups of people to get
together on a subproject basis when collaborating on specific
topics. So Sage-Combinat has become a rather loose community.

All being good things.

Nevertheless, Sage-Combinat and http://combinat.sagemath.org/ are
cited in many places, including 100+ publications. So we want this URL
to keep working, for historical reasons and future work.

Hence my advocacy for keeping the wiki pages
http://wiki.sagemath.org/Combinat/* where they are, and making sure
the URL http://combinat.sagemath.org/ redirects there.

For the two repositories "misc" and "patches": as I mentioned in my
previous mail, we want to keep them around, somewhere. It's a good
occasion to migrate them to git for consistency. I don't mind where
they are hosted, git.sagemath.com, github, or elsewhere.  I was just
suggesting github because there already are many Sage-related repos
there.

As for the *machine* combinat.sagemath.org: this used to be a physical
machine, funded in 2012 or something by one of our NSF grant.

- It's ok if combinat.sagemath.org does not point to a physical
  machine or actually a machine at all.

- For the hardware: IIRC, it's been recycled to power some of the Sage
  infrastructure and SMC. All is good as long as it is put to good use
  for the Sage community until it's time to be retired.

Cheers,
                          Nicolas


PS: Another factor why Sage-Combinat is somewhat quieter as such (and
in particular the wiki pages got outdated!) is that the energy I was
spending animating this community got diverted by my leading the ODK
European project. I can't wait until I get back to combinatorics
development ...


On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 11:04:18PM -0800, Matthew Rennekamp wrote:
>    I'm not sure about pulling anything into GitHub. Adding to reasons
>    here https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/sage-devel/j3BtPrq62kg, we
>    might just go ahead and make it a repo on git.sagemath.com, or add it
>    all to trac. Would a website now be useful as it had been? It seems
>    like Combinat is just a name for a niche group of developers. What sort
>    of history precedes and succeeds this all? Since I only got into
>    [technically, returned to] Sage within the last month, I both have a
>    lack of relationships with developers and a general lack of knowledge
>    about the who's/what's/why's of the project. William gave me access to
>    the files, so I'll be looking through them over the weekend.
>    So, if GitHub wouldn't be an option, what then? Again, we could move it
>    to the main git host or merge it all to one of SageWiki or trac, but we
>    could simply "revive" combinat.sagemath.org. I worry that doing so will
>    unnecessarily spread out available information, so it would be wise to
>    be precise in what will be there. I can't comment on content when I ad
>    absurdium the purpose of Combinat. (Something about trac being
>    developer's information for coding, SageWiki for organizing full-scale
>    projects, combinat.sagemath.org for academic research stuff, etc. Or
>    something like it would be helpful in describing these relationships.)
>    What about other projects? SageManifolds has their own thing going on,
>    and I don't know much about it.
>    Tl;dr: organisation from higher up needs to be established, in order to
>    keep navigation intuitive. I say that we should just make a page,
>    sagemath.org/combinat , for now.
>    On Thursday, January 12, 2017 at 9:55:18 PM UTC-5, Matthew Rennekamp
>    wrote:
> 
>    I'm working on the [1]www.sagemath.org & SageWiki. What happened to
>    [2]combinat.sagemath.org? Are there other places those files are
>    stored?
> 
>    --
>    You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>    Groups "sage-combinat-devel" group.
>    To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>    an email to [3]sage-combinat-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>    To post to this group, send email to
>    [4]sage-combinat-devel@googlegroups.com.
>    Visit this group at
>    [5]https://groups.google.com/group/sage-combinat-devel.
>    For more options, visit [6]https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
> 
> References
> 
>    1. http://www.sagemath.org/
>    2. http://combinat.sagemath.org/
>    3. mailto:sage-combinat-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
>    4. mailto:sage-combinat-devel@googlegroups.com
>    5. https://groups.google.com/group/sage-combinat-devel
>    6. https://groups.google.com/d/optout

                Nicolas
--
Nicolas M. ThiƩry "Isil" <nthi...@users.sf.net>
http://Nicolas.Thiery.name/

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-combinat-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to sage-combinat-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to sage-combinat-devel@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-combinat-devel.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to