Nice job. You could list somewhere the areas where SAGE is better than anything else: (1) modular forms (functionality), (2) polynomial multiplication, (3) well-designed development environment, (4) SciPy for number crunching (some people on the SciPy list, for example, argue that SciPy is better than Matlab), SAGE is constantly improving through a relatively large number of developers. So you have a number of the best components integrated together, and no SAGE component is "weak", even though it may not (yet) be the fastest in the world.
On 8/17/07, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > I just wrote slides for a 20-minute talk on SAGE I'm giving tomorrow morning. > The target audience is vastly different from that of the last talk I > gave (at CECM). > Imagine an audience that could care less about cost, and just wants the best > possible tools for the job. Any notions of cost, "open source idealism", and > even proof are irrelevant to the target audience of this talk. Please > let me know > if you have any comments. > > -- > William Stein > Associate Professor of Mathematics > University of Washington > http://www.williamstein.org > > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://sage.scipy.org/sage/ and http://modular.math.washington.edu/sage/ -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
