New version here: http://sage.math.washington.edu/lj/talk/talk.pdf http://sage.math.washington.edu/lj/talk/demo.txt
On 8/17/07, David Joyner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Nice job. You could list somewhere the areas where SAGE is better than > anything else: > (1) modular forms (functionality), (2) polynomial multiplication, (3) > well-designed > development environment, (4) SciPy for number crunching (some people > on the SciPy list, > for example, argue that SciPy is better than Matlab), SAGE is > constantly improving > through a relatively large number of developers. So you have a number of the > best components integrated together, and no SAGE component is "weak", > even though it may not (yet) be the fastest in the world. > > > On 8/17/07, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I just wrote slides for a 20-minute talk on SAGE I'm giving tomorrow > > morning. > > The target audience is vastly different from that of the last talk I > > gave (at CECM). > > Imagine an audience that could care less about cost, and just wants the best > > possible tools for the job. Any notions of cost, "open source idealism", > > and > > even proof are irrelevant to the target audience of this talk. Please > > let me know > > if you have any comments. > > > > -- > > William Stein > > Associate Professor of Mathematics > > University of Washington > > http://www.williamstein.org > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- William Stein Associate Professor of Mathematics University of Washington http://www.williamstein.org --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://sage.scipy.org/sage/ and http://modular.math.washington.edu/sage/ -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
