On Aug 24, 7:18 pm, "David Joyner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello David,
> On 8/24/07, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I will add the needed bits to the trac ticket. Is there a test suite
> > for Lie I could/should run?
>
> In .../LiE/progs there are some test files.
>
I ran them all and none of them crashed/complained. test1 gave an
awful lot of output, but according to the shell Lie terminated with
exit status 0. Some from the perspective of Solaris there seem to be
no problems which is very good news for the Sage Solaris port, we have
enough unresolved issues as it is there :(. They are getting steadily
fewer, but if there is anybody out there with deep knowledge about the
NTL and gcc 4.2 on Solaris and likes weired linker failures please
speak up.
Is it worth it to give feedback back to the Lie people regarding
Solaris? A quick grep didn't turn up anything useful, but this is the
undocumented source package after all:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] LiE$ grep -r [Ss]olaris *
Binary file Lie.exe matches
[EMAIL PROTECTED] LiE$
Cheers,
Michael
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URLs: http://sage.scipy.org/sage/ and http://modular.math.washington.edu/sage/
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
