On 8/24/07, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On Aug 24, 7:18 pm, "David Joyner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hello David, > > > On 8/24/07, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > I will add the needed bits to the trac ticket. Is there a test suite > > > for Lie I could/should run? > > > > In .../LiE/progs there are some test files. > > > > I ran them all and none of them crashed/complained. test1 gave an > awful lot of output, but according to the shell Lie terminated with > exit status 0. Some from the perspective of Solaris there seem to be > no problems which is very good news for the Sage Solaris port, we have > enough unresolved issues as it is there :(. They are getting steadily > fewer, but if there is anybody out there with deep knowledge about the > NTL and gcc 4.2 on Solaris and likes weired linker failures please > speak up. > > Is it worth it to give feedback back to the Lie people regarding > Solaris? A quick grep didn't turn up anything useful, but this is the
Marc van Leeuwen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is the current maintainer. He seems very helpful and would probably appreciate feedback. > undocumented source package after all: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] LiE$ grep -r [Ss]olaris * > Binary file Lie.exe matches > [EMAIL PROTECTED] LiE$ > > Cheers, > > Michael > > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://sage.scipy.org/sage/ and http://modular.math.washington.edu/sage/ -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
