> > Take ticket 729 as an example > > (http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/729): It was closed by Robert > > (rml) because the bugfix/feature request was invalid. Michael (mabshoff) > > reopened it due to the rule state above. But there is nothing for the > > release manager to do and I feel perfectly comfortable with rml closing > > invalid tickets for the Graph subsystem. So I think in those cases it > > makes perfectly sense to just close tickets. > > Well, I see it the same way: rml is responsible for the graph > subsystem, so he is the person with the expertise to determine that > the ticket is invalid. But he closed that ticket against 2.9, while it > is customary to close invalid tickets against the "sage-duplicate/ > invalid" milestone. The same applies for #731. It is not so much the > marking the ticket invalid, it just ended up against the wrong > milestone.
Why do we need to change the milestone for invalid tickets? Martin -- name: Martin Albrecht _pgp: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x8EF0DC99 _www: http://www.informatik.uni-bremen.de/~malb _jab: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://sage.scipy.org/sage/ and http://modular.math.washington.edu/sage/ -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
